Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a Vape Pen Battery tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.